<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mutual Fund Return Lies:  Average Annual Return vs Compound Annual Growth Rate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://amateurassetallocator.com/2008/02/17/mutual-fund-return-lies-average-annual-return-vs-compound-annual-growth-rate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://amateurassetallocator.com/2008/02/17/mutual-fund-return-lies-average-annual-return-vs-compound-annual-growth-rate/</link>
	<description>Amateur Asset Allocator</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 01:38:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry Okamura</title>
		<link>http://amateurassetallocator.com/2008/02/17/mutual-fund-return-lies-average-annual-return-vs-compound-annual-growth-rate/comment-page-1/#comment-21772</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry Okamura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 22:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amateurassetallocator.com/2008/02/17/mutual-fund-return-lies-average-annual-return-vs-compound-annual-growth-rate/#comment-21772</guid>
		<description>Since the vast majority of people who put their money in a mutual fund, do so with every paycheck.  What is their average rate of return, then?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since the vast majority of people who put their money in a mutual fund, do so with every paycheck.  What is their average rate of return, then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Teamson</title>
		<link>http://amateurassetallocator.com/2008/02/17/mutual-fund-return-lies-average-annual-return-vs-compound-annual-growth-rate/comment-page-1/#comment-13359</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Teamson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 18:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amateurassetallocator.com/2008/02/17/mutual-fund-return-lies-average-annual-return-vs-compound-annual-growth-rate/#comment-13359</guid>
		<description>Anonymou above gives a non-answer. All he says is that the SEC has a method, but does not say what that method is. Post the formula.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anonymou above gives a non-answer. All he says is that the SEC has a method, but does not say what that method is. Post the formula.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rene Culler</title>
		<link>http://amateurassetallocator.com/2008/02/17/mutual-fund-return-lies-average-annual-return-vs-compound-annual-growth-rate/comment-page-1/#comment-8978</link>
		<dc:creator>Rene Culler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 19:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amateurassetallocator.com/2008/02/17/mutual-fund-return-lies-average-annual-return-vs-compound-annual-growth-rate/#comment-8978</guid>
		<description>The info can be from years before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The info can be from years before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rajesh ruparel</title>
		<link>http://amateurassetallocator.com/2008/02/17/mutual-fund-return-lies-average-annual-return-vs-compound-annual-growth-rate/comment-page-1/#comment-6021</link>
		<dc:creator>rajesh ruparel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 13:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amateurassetallocator.com/2008/02/17/mutual-fund-return-lies-average-annual-return-vs-compound-annual-growth-rate/#comment-6021</guid>
		<description>i invested $50,000 in 1995 in S&amp;P 500 index fund, when S&amp;P was 600. now in 2009 after 14yrs the balance in my fund is only 35,000. whereas S&amp;P is right now at 950 something. what happened to my funds. i thought it would have become 75,000.or more. where did they or S&amp;P lie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i invested $50,000 in 1995 in S&amp;P 500 index fund, when S&amp;P was 600. now in 2009 after 14yrs the balance in my fund is only 35,000. whereas S&amp;P is right now at 950 something. what happened to my funds. i thought it would have become 75,000.or more. where did they or S&amp;P lie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://amateurassetallocator.com/2008/02/17/mutual-fund-return-lies-average-annual-return-vs-compound-annual-growth-rate/comment-page-1/#comment-5317</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 20:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amateurassetallocator.com/2008/02/17/mutual-fund-return-lies-average-annual-return-vs-compound-annual-growth-rate/#comment-5317</guid>
		<description>Not true.  In the 1990&#039;s you would&#039;ve been right about your assumptions.  A lot of funds calculated returns in various ways, including arithmetic mean.  However, since the late 90s, Mutual funds are required to use a calculation for returns that has been set forth by the SEC.  This is a total return formula that assumes all dividends and interest are reinvested.  It is not complicated but is far from a simple arithmetic average.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not true.  In the 1990&#8242;s you would&#8217;ve been right about your assumptions.  A lot of funds calculated returns in various ways, including arithmetic mean.  However, since the late 90s, Mutual funds are required to use a calculation for returns that has been set forth by the SEC.  This is a total return formula that assumes all dividends and interest are reinvested.  It is not complicated but is far from a simple arithmetic average.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

