<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should Risk Tolerance Determine Asset Allocation?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://amateurassetallocator.com/2008/05/19/should-risk-tolerance-determine-asset-allocation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://amateurassetallocator.com/2008/05/19/should-risk-tolerance-determine-asset-allocation/</link>
	<description>Amateur Asset Allocator</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:16:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve G.</title>
		<link>http://amateurassetallocator.com/2008/05/19/should-risk-tolerance-determine-asset-allocation/comment-page-1/#comment-4704</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 23:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amateurassetallocator.com/?p=178#comment-4704</guid>
		<description>The point is well taken, and raises the issue of the separation between behavioural finance and rational decisions. Fortunately/Unfortunately investors more often than not are ruled by emotions. 

Nonetheless in my experience if the investor has not had the chance to experience at least one downturn, he/she will not be certain how they will react when the time comes to pay the piper. Once you&#039;ve seen your investments recover, you are most likely ready to withstand the future downturns because you have the experience under your belt. Until that time, risk tolerance will always be the wild card. Since the best laid plans will run amok once panic selling kicks in. 

I remember many moons ago, when I learned that small cap stocks had always outperformed large cap stocks, I told myself, why then, would anybody invest in large caps? Just keep the small caps for a long time, at least 10 years, since very few have shown losses over that time period, and sleep tight! 

If you&#039;re ready to ride the roller coaster...you will be o.k...but you better know yourself really well!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point is well taken, and raises the issue of the separation between behavioural finance and rational decisions. Fortunately/Unfortunately investors more often than not are ruled by emotions. </p>
<p>Nonetheless in my experience if the investor has not had the chance to experience at least one downturn, he/she will not be certain how they will react when the time comes to pay the piper. Once you&#8217;ve seen your investments recover, you are most likely ready to withstand the future downturns because you have the experience under your belt. Until that time, risk tolerance will always be the wild card. Since the best laid plans will run amok once panic selling kicks in. </p>
<p>I remember many moons ago, when I learned that small cap stocks had always outperformed large cap stocks, I told myself, why then, would anybody invest in large caps? Just keep the small caps for a long time, at least 10 years, since very few have shown losses over that time period, and sleep tight! </p>
<p>If you&#8217;re ready to ride the roller coaster&#8230;you will be o.k&#8230;but you better know yourself really well!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Four Pillars</title>
		<link>http://amateurassetallocator.com/2008/05/19/should-risk-tolerance-determine-asset-allocation/comment-page-1/#comment-1390</link>
		<dc:creator>Four Pillars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 14:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amateurassetallocator.com/?p=178#comment-1390</guid>
		<description>I think knowledge is a big part of it.  The fact that these &quot;conservative&quot; investors have 10%+ invested in their company stock indicates that they don&#039;t know enough to evaluate the riskiness of their portfolio or just as likely they haven&#039;t bothered to do so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think knowledge is a big part of it.  The fact that these &#8220;conservative&#8221; investors have 10%+ invested in their company stock indicates that they don&#8217;t know enough to evaluate the riskiness of their portfolio or just as likely they haven&#8217;t bothered to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
