<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Brief Review Of PFBuzz</title>
	<atom:link href="http://amateurassetallocator.com/2008/08/21/a-brief-review-of-pfbuzz/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://amateurassetallocator.com/2008/08/21/a-brief-review-of-pfbuzz/</link>
	<description>Amateur Asset Allocator</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:16:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pinyo</title>
		<link>http://amateurassetallocator.com/2008/08/21/a-brief-review-of-pfbuzz/comment-page-1/#comment-1655</link>
		<dc:creator>Pinyo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 22:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amateurassetallocator.com/?p=265#comment-1655</guid>
		<description>Kyle, thank you for highlighting PF Buzz. I just checked and noticed that time on site and bounce rate for traffic from PF Buzz is definitely good.  The site is also growing steadily, so I am sure it will bring even more traffic in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kyle, thank you for highlighting PF Buzz. I just checked and noticed that time on site and bounce rate for traffic from PF Buzz is definitely good.  The site is also growing steadily, so I am sure it will bring even more traffic in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Another Personal Finance Blog</title>
		<link>http://amateurassetallocator.com/2008/08/21/a-brief-review-of-pfbuzz/comment-page-1/#comment-1647</link>
		<dc:creator>Another Personal Finance Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 22:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amateurassetallocator.com/?p=265#comment-1647</guid>
		<description>I agree that PFBuzz generates high-quality, interested traffic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that PFBuzz generates high-quality, interested traffic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curt</title>
		<link>http://amateurassetallocator.com/2008/08/21/a-brief-review-of-pfbuzz/comment-page-1/#comment-1644</link>
		<dc:creator>Curt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 18:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amateurassetallocator.com/?p=265#comment-1644</guid>
		<description>Great dig. PFBuzz is becoming a great tool for increasing traffic and getting quality incoming links, which is very important.  But, what about income?  Bloggers usually don&#039;t link on your Adsense ads, and the more ads you show without getting clicks the lower Google rates your pages - which could lower the amount you do get from each click.  In the long run, quality incoming links increases your PageRank and your search traffic, which increases your traffic of people that are more likely to click an Adsense link. But, I&#039;m not sure the too balance each other out.  Any thoughts?  In the end, traffic pays, so that alone makes PF Buzz worth the effort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great dig. PFBuzz is becoming a great tool for increasing traffic and getting quality incoming links, which is very important.  But, what about income?  Bloggers usually don&#8217;t link on your Adsense ads, and the more ads you show without getting clicks the lower Google rates your pages &#8211; which could lower the amount you do get from each click.  In the long run, quality incoming links increases your PageRank and your search traffic, which increases your traffic of people that are more likely to click an Adsense link. But, I&#8217;m not sure the too balance each other out.  Any thoughts?  In the end, traffic pays, so that alone makes PF Buzz worth the effort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

