Why Not Another Stimulus Check, Obama?

2009 March 16
by Kyle
from → Commentary, Economy

I have avoided writing about Obama’s economic stimulus bill for the most part.  This is partly because it’s already so well-covered in the mainstream media and on other blogs, partly because I don’t feel like I have much to add to the debate, and partly because I really have no strong feelings on it one way or another (unlike everyone else, it seems).  However, Curt wrote an interesting post earlier in the week about how he would prefer a stimulus check to a tax deduction, and it got me thinking.

The Proposed Tax Deduction Won’t Stimulate The Economy

I am not particularly a fan of this year’s stimulus payment for the same reason I did not approve of last year’s plan:  I don’t believe it will work and even if it did, I don’t think it’s worth the additional debt.  Actually, I believe this round of stimulus payments will be even less effective than the last round, and here’s why.

**************
Get The Wall Street Journal for 75% off!

**************

The main complaint many people had with Bush’s stimulus checks was that it stimulated the economy temporarily in the quarter they were issued, but had no sustained impact.  To mitigate that and attempt a more sustained stimulus effect, the current administration has opted to structure the stimulus as a tax deduction rather than a one-time payment:  instead of seeing a one-time lump sum check, eligible tax-payers will receive a tax deduction, worth about $12 per week.

So what’s wrong with that?  For starters, most consumers are unlikely to notice an extra $48 per month in they bank account.  Sure, $48 is a God-send when you’re struggling to put food on the table, but it isn’t enough to stimulate spending and prop up the consumer economy.  Think about it, when you received that $600 check last year, many of you probably thought “Great!  Now I can afford to book that cruise/buy that DVD player/buy new rims for the Dodge Charger.”  It was a sort of mini-wealth effect in action:  you suddenly have an extra $600 in your pocket and seek ways to deploy it.  You very well may decide to simply pay down debt or invest, but there are a lot of people out there who couldn’t resist a shopping trip.  After all, if Americans were responsible with money we wouldn’t be in this mess to begin with.

Will an extra $48 per week stimulate additional spending?  I don’t think so because it’s not enough money at a time to make me feel wealthier.  I’m just not going to consciously think “I can afford to eat out at a nice restaurant this week because of that extra $12 in my paycheck” the way that I might if I received $600 all at once.  And I don’t think anybody else will, either.  Mr President, can’t you just write me a check and be done with it?  I promise to spend it foolishly!


Did you enjoy this article?


Please subscribe to our blog via RSS Feed and get great new content delivered straight to your desktop every day!

Or if you prefer, you can have daily updates delivered to you via Email.


Blog Traffic Exchange Related Posts Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites
One Response leave one →
  1. 2009 March 16

    Excellent article. That worst part of it all, is that a stimulus for consumer spending is the worst investment into the economy. The last thing the economy needs right now is to foolishly borrow and spend more money from foreign nations.

    China is started to publically address the very possiblity that they are never going to get their money back. The Obama administration is not asking for money to invest in business development. He is asking China and Japan to pay for a massive social welfare program that produces zero additional wealth.

    It’s no wonder they are questioning how the US is ever going to be able to repay our debts. They are screwed and they know it and there is not much they can do about it – but to stop giving us more money to throw away.

Leave a Reply

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS