<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No Surprise:  Engineering Tops Most Lucrative College Degrees List</title>
	<atom:link href="http://amateurassetallocator.com/2009/07/31/no-surprise-engineering-tops-most-lucrative-college-degrees-list/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://amateurassetallocator.com/2009/07/31/no-surprise-engineering-tops-most-lucrative-college-degrees-list/</link>
	<description>Amateur Asset Allocator</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 04:09:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Early Retirement Extreme</title>
		<link>http://amateurassetallocator.com/2009/07/31/no-surprise-engineering-tops-most-lucrative-college-degrees-list/comment-page-1/#comment-4496</link>
		<dc:creator>Early Retirement Extreme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 22:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amateurassetallocator.com/?p=2088#comment-4496</guid>
		<description>The problem for college entrants is that engineering requires a minimum degree of intelligence without which it is practically impossible to compensate with work ethics and still graduate. It&#039;s around 115---same for the hard sciences. With so many people going to college, statistically, some has be be below average intelligence, and so choosing engineering because if its better entry pay would not be strategically wise because they will simply never graduate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem for college entrants is that engineering requires a minimum degree of intelligence without which it is practically impossible to compensate with work ethics and still graduate. It&#8217;s around 115&#8212;same for the hard sciences. With so many people going to college, statistically, some has be be below average intelligence, and so choosing engineering because if its better entry pay would not be strategically wise because they will simply never graduate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy</title>
		<link>http://amateurassetallocator.com/2009/07/31/no-surprise-engineering-tops-most-lucrative-college-degrees-list/comment-page-1/#comment-4495</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 19:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amateurassetallocator.com/?p=2088#comment-4495</guid>
		<description>This makes a lot of sense. The engineering field is a very dynamic industry that needs qualified and skills professionals and when the supply doesn&#039;t meet the demand then the price organizations are willing to pay for specific engineers is far greater.

Great article and interesting topic of discussion.

TJ
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spec-eng.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Process Engineering&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This makes a lot of sense. The engineering field is a very dynamic industry that needs qualified and skills professionals and when the supply doesn&#8217;t meet the demand then the price organizations are willing to pay for specific engineers is far greater.</p>
<p>Great article and interesting topic of discussion.</p>
<p>TJ<br />
<a href="http://www.spec-eng.com/" rel="nofollow">Process Engineering</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
