Why I Ditched My Vanguard Money Market Fund In Favor Of ING Direct
For several years, I kept my emergency fund in the Vanguard Prime Money Market Fund (VMMXX). For a while, this Vanguard money market fund was yielding over 5% while most high yield savings accounts were stuck in the 4.5% range (those were the days, huh?). This made perfect since, because while online savings accounts are FDIC insured, high yield money market mutual funds are not; I interpreted the yield differential as being compensation for taking on slightly more risk.
All figures are accurate as of the date of publication: 2/8/2010.
And Then Came The Crash…
2008 was a bad year for pretty much everything, but money market funds were hit particularly hard. A few of the larger ones even broke the buck, meaning they had to be subsidized by their sponsoring company to prevent investors from suffering losses. That was the last straw for me.
To add insult to injury, money market fund yields are as low as I ever remember them being in my (admittedly short) investing experience. The highest-yielding taxable Vanguard money market fund, VMMXX, is not yield a dismal 0.02%. That’s not a typo: 0.02%! Surprisingly, the Vanguard Tax-Exempt Money Market Fund (VMSXX) yields over three times as much as its taxable equivalent, or 0.09%. Even investors in the very lowest tax bracket will come out ahead with the tax-exempt fund, and that’s practically unheard of.
It’s Not Worth The Risk
To be sure, Vanguard is a fine mutual fund family and no Vanguard money market fund has ever lost money. Furthermore, the Prime Money Market Fund has been very attentive to risk throughout its history. There is no reason to believe any Vanguard money market fund will ever lose money; however, I’m sure most investors in those other funds felt the same way. It’s just not worth the risk.
Now, I hold my emergency fund at ING Direct, which is yielding 1.2% as of this writing. Not only that, but my account is 100% FDIC-insured to the fullest extent of the law. Even if the money market funds regain their usual yield advantage going forward, I think I’ll stick with ING because
- ING Direct’s rates
are consistently competitive. My emergency fund isn’t huge, so chasing the very highest yields isn’t a priority. ING usually isn’t the highest on the market, but they are also never the lowest.
- Money Market Funds aren’t as safe as I thought they were. The risks can go undetected for years at a time until the fund implodes with no warning. I’m willing to take on additional risk with my long-term investments, but not my emergency fund.
- I have better things to do than worry about an extra $200 per year in interest from my emergency fund. It’s there for safety, not for earning maximum returns.
RSS Feed
Email
American Express Personal Savings is paying 1.5%. Also, many credit unions are paying 1% or so. I too am moving a lot of cash out of Vanguard Prime.
You make a great point about the risk of money markets. Many people think they’re just as safe as FDIC insured savings accounts, but they’re not. Granted, they are less risky than other saving vehicles, but more risky than a savings account.
Also, I agree with not chasing the highest yield for savings accounts, but the difference between 0.02% and 1.2% is big enough for me to make the jump even with a small savings balance!
When yields generally are low, like now, and financial institutions are failing right and left, higher yields indicate higher risk and probably an institution that needs to suck in deposits in order to… well… get their house in order.
It might be safer to take less risk, unless you are getting a Bauer Financial rating report on ING every day. The $40 rating reports are very revealing.
ING is FDIC insured, so I’m not worried about it. The money market fund isn’t, so if anything I would consider the money market fund to be far risker.