<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Store Brand Vs Name Brand</title>
	<atom:link href="http://amateurassetallocator.com/2010/02/23/store-brand-vs-name-brand/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://amateurassetallocator.com/2010/02/23/store-brand-vs-name-brand/</link>
	<description>Amateur Asset Allocator</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 02:58:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sue</title>
		<link>http://amateurassetallocator.com/2010/02/23/store-brand-vs-name-brand/comment-page-1/#comment-11650</link>
		<dc:creator>Sue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 02:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amateurassetallocator.com/?p=3911#comment-11650</guid>
		<description>Store brands are not always a cheaper buy than brand names, especially with groceries.  By using manufacturers coupons, you can usually buy brand name groceries for a lot less than store brands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Store brands are not always a cheaper buy than brand names, especially with groceries.  By using manufacturers coupons, you can usually buy brand name groceries for a lot less than store brands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://amateurassetallocator.com/2010/02/23/store-brand-vs-name-brand/comment-page-1/#comment-7475</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 15:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amateurassetallocator.com/?p=3911#comment-7475</guid>
		<description>Chemistry, I stopped with intro to organic back in college, so I had no idea.  Thanks for the info!  I&#039;m going to interject with that little gem next time one of my smart-alec co-workers says something stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chemistry, I stopped with intro to organic back in college, so I had no idea.  Thanks for the info!  I&#8217;m going to interject with that little gem next time one of my smart-alec co-workers says something stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chemistry</title>
		<link>http://amateurassetallocator.com/2010/02/23/store-brand-vs-name-brand/comment-page-1/#comment-7467</link>
		<dc:creator>Chemistry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 03:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amateurassetallocator.com/?p=3911#comment-7467</guid>
		<description>Just so you&#039;re aware, most generic medicines do contain the same ingredients as the name brands, but actually contain about half of the active ingredients.  This is due to molecule orientation.  All proteins in the body are left handed, and only left handed molecules react with them.  The name brand medicines contain mostly left handed molecules, but the generics are usually made with cheaper processes that do not filter out the right handed molecules leaving you with a 50/50 split.  This does not mean you can take double though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just so you&#8217;re aware, most generic medicines do contain the same ingredients as the name brands, but actually contain about half of the active ingredients.  This is due to molecule orientation.  All proteins in the body are left handed, and only left handed molecules react with them.  The name brand medicines contain mostly left handed molecules, but the generics are usually made with cheaper processes that do not filter out the right handed molecules leaving you with a 50/50 split.  This does not mean you can take double though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wojciech Kulicki</title>
		<link>http://amateurassetallocator.com/2010/02/23/store-brand-vs-name-brand/comment-page-1/#comment-7448</link>
		<dc:creator>Wojciech Kulicki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 21:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amateurassetallocator.com/?p=3911#comment-7448</guid>
		<description>&quot;Purpose&quot; - I have to admit, I&#039;ve never looked at my love of generics from this perspective (maybe only subconsciously). But it makes a lot of sense to spend extra where there is some perceived value, and opt for the cheapos where it doesn&#039;t make a difference.

Thanks for the idea!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Purpose&#8221; &#8211; I have to admit, I&#8217;ve never looked at my love of generics from this perspective (maybe only subconsciously). But it makes a lot of sense to spend extra where there is some perceived value, and opt for the cheapos where it doesn&#8217;t make a difference.</p>
<p>Thanks for the idea!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

